Kesavananda Bharati Case

Kesavananda Bharati Case

51 years of Kesavananda Bharati judgement.

  • Challenged the Kerala land reforms legislation in 1970, which imposed restrictions on the management of religious property.
  • The law challenged under Article 26, concerning the right to manage religiously owned property without government interference.
  • A 13-judge Bench was set up by the Supreme Court, the biggest so far, to hear the case.
  • Verdict – Court upheld the validity of the 24th Constitutional Amendment Act (1971) saying any provision of the Indian Constitution can be amended by the Parliament including the Fundamental Rights.
  • As per 24th Amendment, Constitutional Amendments were not considered laws under Article 13.
  • However, the Court laid down a new doctrine of the ‘basic structure’ saying any such amendment cannot change Constitution’s basic structure.
  • Shankari Prasad case (1951) and Sajjan Singh case (1965)The Supreme Court conceded absolute power to Parliament in amending the Constitution
  • Golaknath case (1967)Supreme Court took a U-turn from its earlier verdict and held that an amendment under Article 368 is “law” within the meaning of Article 13 and therefore, Parliament could not amend Fundamental Rights.
  • 24th Constitutional (Amendment) Act, 1971 – To dis-effect the judgment of the Supreme Court, the government enacted 24th Amendment giving Parliament the power to amend any part of the Constitution.
  • 25th Constitutional (Amendment) Act, 1972– The right to property had been removed as a fundamental right.
  • The term is not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution.
  • Supreme Court is yet to define or clarify as to what constitutes the ‘basic structure’ of the Constitution.
  • Some important elements of the ‘basic structure’, as evolved from various judgements –
    • Supremacy of the Constitution
    • Secularism – SR Bommai case (1994)
    • Judicial review – Minerva Mills case (1980)
    • Parliamentary system
    • Rule of law
    • Independence of Judiciary
    • Limited power of Parliament to amend the Constitution

Source: The Indian Express


Previous Year Question

The Ninth Schedule was introduced in the Constitution of India during the prime ministership of:

[UPSC Civil Service Exam – 2019 Prelims]

(a) Jawaharlal Nehru
(b) Lal Bahadur Shastri
(c) Indira Gandhi
(d) Morarji Desai

Answer: (a)


Practice Question

Consider the following statements:

  1. In Kesavananda Bharati case, Supreme Court held that constitutional amendments under Article 368 does not come under the definition of ‘laws’ as prescribed under Article 13.
  2. The term ‘basic structure’ is mentioned in Article 368 of the Constitution.

Which of the statements is/are correct?

 
 
 
 

Question 1 of 1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *