Cross the boulders in the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT)

Indus Waters Treaty

Syllabus: GS2 – Bilateral, regional and global grouping involving India and affecting India’s interests, India and its neighborhood-relations

Source: The Hindu – 31/08/2023

Context

India’s protest against Pakistan’s “unilateral” decision to approach a court of arbitration at The Hague in the Netherlands on the issue related to the Indus waters treaty.


Content

Indus Waters Treaty(IWT)

  • The Indus system comprises the main Indus River, Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Beas and Sutlej.
  • The basin is mainly shared by India and Pakistan with a small share for China and Afghanistan.
  • The Indus Water Treaty (IWT) is a water-distribution treaty between India and Pakistan, arranged and negotiated by the World Bank, to use the water available in the Indus River and its tributaries
  • Under the Indus Waters Treaty signed  in 1960, all the waters of three rivers, namely Ravi, Sutlej and Beas             ( Eastern Rivers) averaging around 33 million acre feet ( MAF) were allocated to India for exclusive use.
  • The waters of Western rivers – Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab averaging to around 135 MAF were allocated to Pakistan.
Fig: Sharing of waters between India and Pakistan
  • India has  been given the right to generate hydroelectricity through run of the river(RoR) projects on the Western Rivers which, subject to specific criteria for design and operation, is unrestricted.

Run-of-the River Project: Type of hydroelectric generation plant whereby little or no water storage is provided. Run-of-river hydro projects use the natural downward flow of rivers and micro turbine generators to capture the kinetic energy carried by water. Typically water is taken from the river at a high point and diverted to a channel, pipeline, or pressurized pipeline (or penstock).

  • The treaty also allows India to use the western river waters for limited irrigation use and unlimited non-consumptive use such as power generation, navigation, floating of property, fish culture, etc.
  • Permanent Indus Commission (PIC), a bilateral commission consisting of officials from India and Pakistan, was created to implement and manage the goals, objectives and outlines of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT).
  • It was established to resolve any disputes that may arise in water sharing, with a mechanism for arbitration to resolve conflicts amicably.
  • If PIC fails, the dispute goes to a Neutral expert appointed by the World Bank.

Significance of the treaty

  • The Indus Waters Treaty is considered as one of the most successful water sharing endeavours in the world .
  • The treaty fixed and delimited the rights and obligations of both countries concerning the use of the waters of the Indus River system.
  • The treaty helped to reduce hostilities between India and Pakistan.
  • It provides a mechanism for resolving disputes that may arise in water sharing, with a Permanent Indus Commission set up for dispute resolution.
  • The treaty is crucial for agriculture in India and  Pakistan as millions of hectares of farmlands are irrigated by river Indus and its tributaries.
  • The treaty is also significant for India as it provides an impetus to India for attaining Renewable energy goals  through run of the river projects.

Challenges/Issues

  • Trust deficit: Due to a wide trust deficit between the two countries, there is a remote chance of Pakistan accepting India’s request to renegotiate to modify some of the provisions in the IWT.
  • Water scarcity: The growing water scarcity in India and Pakistan is causing stress on the smooth working of the Indus Water Treaty.
  • Climatic and environmental changes: Emerging climatic and environmental changes to the Indus basin rivers system are also causing problems in the working of the Indus Water Treaty.
  • Settlement of disputes: Disagreements over the design features of two hydroelectric power plants, Kishanganga and Ratle.
    • Eg: Pakistan has complained that the Kishanganga Project affects its own Neelum Jhelum Hydropower Plant.
    • Also, it has frequently alleged that the Ratle Hydroelectric Project violates the Indus Waters Treaty.
  • Reinterpretation of the treaty: Being a lower riparian state, Pakistan has faced issues on how to reinterpret the Indus Waters Treaty without giving up its water rights.

Way Forward

  • Incorporate “equitable and reasonable  utilization” and the “no harm rule” in the IWT by creating better ties and enduring trust between India and  Pakistan. 
  • There is a need to involve local stakeholders also in any negotiation process between India and Pakistan on shared water issues. 
  • A  joint group comprising technocrats, climate experts,water managementprofessionals, and scientists from both countries can be set up to look at the core of theproblem.
  • Need to update certain technical specifications and expand the scope of the agreement to address climate change.

Related topics

Hydroelectric projects of India in the Indus River system recently in news

Kishanganga Project

  • The Kishanganga Hydroelectric Project is a run-of-the-river hydroelectric project in Jammu and Kashmir.
  • Its dam diverts water from the Kishanganga River to a power plant in the Jhelum River basin.
  • It has an installed capacity of 330 MW.

Ratle Hydroelectric Project

  • Ratle Hydroelectric Project (850 MW), is a Run of River Scheme located on River Chenab in Jammu and Kashmir.
  • The project includes a 133 m tall gravity dam and two power stations adjacent to one another. The installed capacity of both power stations will be 850 MW.

Advantages of these projects:

  • Provides renewable and sustainable sources of energy.
  • The construction activities of the Projects will result in direct and indirect employment to thousands of people.
  • Also,it will Increase disposable income which in turn will lead to socio-economic development of the region.

Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA)

  • The Permanent Court of Arbitration, established in 1899, is an intergovernmental organization providing a variety of dispute resolution services to the international community.
  • The PCA has a three-part organizational structure consisting of an Administrative Council that oversees its policies and budgets, a panel of independent potential arbitrators known as the Members of the Court, and its Secretariat, known as the International Bureau, headed by the Secretary-General.

Reference

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *