National Register of Citizens (NRC) | Assam Accord

National Register of Citizens (NRC) | Assam Accord

Chief Justice is heading a Constitution Bench hearing a series of petitions challenging the constitutionality of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955.

  • An official record of those who are legal Indian citizens.
  • Identify migrants from erstwhile East Pakistan, now Bangladesh.
  • AssamOnly state to have an NRC (at present)
  • 1st prepared in 1951 and finally updated in 2019.
  • NRC was updated as per provisions of –
    • Citizenship Act, 1955
    • Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003.

Section 6A of Citizenship Act – Under it, foreigners who had entered Assam before January 1, 1966, would have all rights and obligations of Indian citizens.

  • It includes persons whose names appear in any of the electoral rolls up to the midnight of 24th March 1971 or NRC, 1951, and their descendants.
  • Its origin can be traced back to Assam Accord 1985.
  • Non-inclusion of a person’s name in NRC does not by itself amount to him/her being declared a foreigner.
  • Such individuals will have option to present their case before foreigners’ tribunals.
  • Memorandum of Settlement (MoS) signed in New Delhi on 15 August 1985.
  • Signed between – Government of India and the leaders of the Assam Movement
  • Key demands –
    • All those foreigners who had entered Assam between 1951 and 1961 were to be given full citizenship, including the right to vote.
    • Those who had done so after 1971 were to be deported
    • The entrants between 1961 and 1971 were to be denied voting rights for ten years but would enjoy all other rights of citizenship.
  • Results –
    • Brought an end to the Assam Agitation
    • Paved the way for the leaders of the agitation to form a political party and form a government in the state
    • Gave package for the economic development of Assam (a second oil refinery, a paper mill and an institute of technology etc.)

Source: The Hindu


Previous Year Question

With reference to India, consider the following statements:
1. There is only one citizenship and one domicile.
2. A citizen by birth only can become the Head of State.
3. A foreigner once granted the citizenship cannot be deprived of it under any circumstances.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

[UPSC Civil Services Exam – 2021 Prelims]

(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) 1 and 3
(d) 2 and 3

Answer: (a)
Explanation:
In India, both a citizen by birth as well as a naturalized citizen is eligible for the office of President while in the USA, only a citizen by birth and not a naturalized citizen is eligible for the office of President. Hence, Statement 2 is not correct.
The Citizenship Act, 1955, prescribes three ways of losing citizenship whether acquired under the Act or before it under the Constitution, viz, renunciation, termination, and deprivation. Hence, Statement 3 is not correct.


Practice Question

Consider the following statements with respect to the National Register of Citizens (NRC):

  1. The non-included people in the list of NRC have the option to present their case before foreigners’ tribunals, the tribunals decision is final and binding and the person cannot move to any other court.
  2. NRC is a part of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA).

Which of the statement(s) given above is/are correct?

 
 
 
 

Question 1 of 1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *