A fact check unit that is unconstitutional

Syllabus: GS Paper 3 – Challenges to Internal Security through Communication Networks, Role of Media and Social Networking Sites in Internal Security Challenges, Basics of Cyber Security

Context: Recently, the Government of Tamil Nadu issued an order to establish a Fact Check Unit with the aim of verifying the authenticity of information pertaining to the government across various media platforms.

Source: The Hindu | Editorial dated 21 November 2023

  • The Information Technology Amendment Rules, 2022
    • Amended IT Rules, 2021 provide the government with fact-checking powers.
    • Rule 3(1)(b)(v) specifies due diligence expectations for intermediaries, requiring them to inform users about rules, regulations, privacy policies, and user agreements.
    • The rule also obligates intermediaries to take measures preventing users from sharing intentional misinformation as identified by the government’s fact-check unit.
    • Initial proposed amendments in January 2023 extended fact-checking powers to PIB’s fact-check unit and other authorized agencies, enabling them to fact-check any online content, including government-related information. Intermediaries were mandated to take down such content.
    • The final version narrows the scope, allowing only the government fact-check unit to fact-check government-related content.
  • The Tamil Nadu government’s Fact Checking Unit
    • Tamil Nadu government established a Fact-Check Unit to combat fake news, misinformation, and hate speech.
    • Objective is to deter and verify information related to the Government of Tamil Nadu on all media platforms.
    • Unit checks announcements, policies, schemes, and initiatives of the state government for authenticity.
    • Powers include suomotu cognizance of social media posts, acting on complaints, and using fact-checking tools.
    • Verified information categorized as actionable or non-actionable, with legal action initiated for the former.
    • Disseminates verified information through social media for public awareness.
  • Fake news has a historical presence dating back to the advent of the printing press.
  • In the contemporary age of the internet and social media, fake news has gained significant traction.
  • Fake news refers to intentionally fabricated or misleading information presented as genuine news.
  • It encompasses a spectrum, spanning entirely fabricated narratives to deceptive headlines and the strategic manipulation of information through selective editing or presenting it out of context.
  • This can be disseminated through various media channels, including print, electronic, and social media.
  • Its primary objectives often include influencing public opinion for political motives or disseminating misinformation about individuals, entities, or events.
  • Fake news proliferates six times more rapidly than accurate information on online platforms.
  • During the Covid-19 pandemic, India faced a substantial amount of misinformation (16%), differing from the West where anti-vaccine narratives were prominent.
  • In India, diverse claims, such as immunity and natural remedies, emerged, necessitating specific messaging from the government and experts.
  • Despite the emergence of fact-checking initiatives in the country, a 2018 survey revealed that almost 45% of respondents were unaware of any fact-checking organizations.
  • In 2020, cases filed under Section 505 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) against individuals ‘circulating fake/false news/rumors’ increased by 214%, as reported by the National Crime Records Bureau.
  • Online manipulation and disinformation tactics observed in elections across 18 countries, including the US.
  • Both state and non-state actors increasingly deploy automated accounts to manipulate online discussions.
  • In Mexico, around 75,000 automated accounts, known as Peñabots, are used to overpower political opposition on Twitter.
  • Bots are utilized to drown out activists with hate speech on the web.
  • Ensuring Accuracy:
    • Verifies information through rigorous research.
    • Assesses credibility and truthfulness.
    • Distinguishes between reliable data and misinformation.
  • Countering Fake News:
    • Debunks false claims systematically.
    • Identifies misleading narratives.
    • Minimizes the impact of false information.
  • Promoting Media Literacy:
    • Enhances critical thinking skills.
    • Encourages questioning and verification.
    • Serves as a resource for accurate information.
  • Enhancing Transparency:
    • Operates with transparency.
    • Provides detailed explanations.
    • Builds trust, fostering credibility.
  • Holding Accountable:
    • Exposes those spreading misinformation.
    • Identifies and discourages sources.
    • Promotes ethical standards in media.
  • Concerns of Government Overreach: Worries about potential government overreach, particularly in the context of imminent elections.
  • Impact on Freedom of Speech: Regulations for significant social media intermediaries and online publishers may compromise freedom of speech.
  • Privacy Concerns: Lack of procedural safeguards for law enforcement requests raises privacy concerns.
  • Violations of Legal Principles: Tamil Nadu Government Order (GO) perceived as violating established legal principles.
  • Chilling Effect on Fundamental Rights: Chilling effect on freedom of speech and expression, a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.
  • Need for Legislative Restrictions: Restrictions on freedom of speech should be legislated; a Government Order is not considered a valid legal instrument.
  • Undefined Phrasing in GO: Phrase “information related to the Government of Tamil Nadu” not defined in the GO.
  • Ambiguity Impacting Freedom: Lack of clarity raises questions about content falling under fact-checking scrutiny. Ambiguity may hinder freedom of speech and expression, affecting citizens’ right to information.
  • Lack of Hearing Opportunities: Absence of opportunities for a hearing to the author of the post.
  • Government as Judge and Jury: Government acting as judge, jury, and executioner on the authenticity of information, lacking due process.
  • No Specific Law Against Fake News:
    • India lacks a specific law targeting fake news, with freedom of speech under Article 19 of the Constitution governing news publication.
  • Press Council of India:
    • Regulatory body empowered to warn, admonish, or censure newspapers, news agencies, editors, or journalists for violating journalistic ethics.
  • News Broadcasters Association (NBA):
    • Represents private television news broadcasters, serving as a self-regulatory body to investigate complaints against electronic media.
  • Indian Broadcast Foundation (IBF):
    • Addresses complaints against content aired by channels, contributing to the self-regulation of the broadcasting industry.
  • Information Technology Act, 2000 (Section 66):
    • Provides legal measures against dishonest or fraudulent acts causing damage to computer systems, with potential imprisonment or fines.
  • Future legislation should consider the broader context and not solely blame the media.
  • Controlling fake news is complex; not controlling trolls could lead to instability, while excessive control could harm democracy.
  • Countermeasures should focus on public education, regulation strengthening, and tech companies developing suitable algorithms for news curation.
  • India’s strong fact-checking community and leading software industry can form a multifaceted approach to misinformation.
  • Can serve as a model for other nations, particularly in the Global South.
  • India collaborated with WhatsApp in 2018 to address misleading videos leading to lynchings similar initiatives can be considered.
  • Emphasizes teaching people to verify sources, fact-check claims, and discern reliable from unreliable news sources.
  • Journalists should adhere to ethical standards and be accountable.
  • Media organizations play a role in promoting responsible journalism and fact-checking.
  • Use artificial intelligence tools and collaborate with fact-checking organizations for verification.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *