Citizens with disabilities, making their rights real

Citizens with disabilities, making their rights real

Syllabus
GS Paper 2 – Welfare schemes for vulnerable sections of the population by the Centre and States and the performance of these schemes; mechanisms, laws, institutions and Bodies constituted for the protection and betterment of these vulnerable sections.

Context
The data from the 2011 national Census of India indicate that persons with disabilities constitute 2.21 % of the total population.

Source
The Hindu | Editorial dated 3rd December 2024


Citizens with disabilities, making their rights real

The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (RPWD Act) aims to protect and promote the rights and dignity of persons with disabilities (PwDs). A key provision of this law is the establishment of State Commissioners for Disabilities to ensure effective implementation of disability rights. However, the performance of these offices has been uneven across States, raising critical concerns about their capacity, autonomy, and functioning.

  • The RPWD Act replaced the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995, aligning India’s disability legislation with the UN Convention on the  Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2007) .
  • It mandates the appointment of State Commissioners for Disabilities to ensure compliance with the Act.
  • State Commissioners have quasi-judicial powers under Section 82, equivalent to those of a civil court, enabling them to intervene in matters of discrimination and non-compliance.
  • Their role includes review, monitoring, and advocacy to promote disability-inclusive policies and practices.
  • Inadequate Appointment Processes:
    • A majority of Commissioners are drawn from the civil services, often holding additional charges, which compromises their ability to function impartially.
    • Only eight States (as of 2021-22) have appointed Commissioners from civil society backgrounds, undermining the objective of the Act.
  • Delayed Appointments:
    • Many States face delays in filling the position, leaving persons with disabilities without adequate recourse.
  • Lack of Independence:
    • Commissioners often lack autonomy, as they are part of the nodal ministry, which creates potential conflicts of interest.
  • Failure to Exercise Quasi-Judicial Powers:
    • Despite significant powers, many Commissioners fail to take suo motu action against discriminatory policies or practices.
    • A lack of interaction with persons with disabilities and their organizations further reduces their effectiveness.
  • Inconsistent Monitoring:
    • The absence of regular monitoring and reporting on implementation of quotas and welfare schemeslimits the accountability of implementing agencies.
  • Erosion of Trust:
    • Inadequate responses to grievances have led to a decline in public confidence in these statutory offices.
  • Innovative Approaches in Karnataka:
    • Mobile Adalats: Karnataka’s Commissioner’s office organized mobile courts to address grievances of PwDs in remote areas, resolving many issues on the spot.
    • District Disability Management Reviews (DDMR): This tool monitors the implementation of disability-inclusive policies at the district level.
    • Collaboration with Legal Experts: Partnerships with law schools have strengthened the quasi-judicial capacities of the Commissioner’s office.
  • Delhi’s Leadership:
    • The Delhi State Commissioner’s office has been proactive in addressing complaints and ensuring timely grievance redressal.
  • Promoting Research:
    • State Commissioners are mandated to undertake disability-focused research, opening avenues for collaboration with UN entities and academic institutions.
    • Research areas include:
      • Disability-inclusive social protection
      • Impact of climate change on persons with disabilities
      • Inclusive care economy policies
  • Advancing Inclusive Policies:
    • Research findings can shape evidence-based policies, ensuring that disability rights are integrated into broader development agendas.
  • Transparent and Inclusive Appointments:
    • Appoint individuals with substantial expertise in law, human rights, and disability advocacy, prioritizing women with disabilities to address intersectional challenges.
  • Capacity Building:
    • Regular training for Commissioners to enhance their understanding of quasi-judicial powers and disability rights laws.
  • Public Accountability:
    • Develop user-friendly dashboards to provide real-time updates on cases received, resolved, and pending.
    • Ensure the publication of annual and special reports on law implementation and gaps.
  • Decentralized Governance:
    • Designate District Magistrates as Deputy Commissioners for Disabilities to promote local-level inclusion.
  • Strengthen Engagement with PwDs:
    • Regularly consult organizations of persons with disabilities (OPDs) to identify policy gaps and discriminatory practices.
  • Focus on Marginalized Groups:
    • Develop policies addressing the specific needs of women and girls with disabilities, who face dual discrimination.
    • Promote accessibility in education, employment, and healthcare for these groups.
  • Enhanced Monitoring of Inclusive Policies:
    • Ensure that reservations and welfare schemes for PwDs are implemented effectively at all levels.

The office of the State Commissioners holds immense potential to drive disability-inclusive governance and protect the rights of persons with disabilities. However, challenges in appointments, autonomy, and capacity have limited their effectiveness.  Strengthening the role of State Commissioners is essential to ensure that the promises of the RPWD Act translate into tangible benefits for India’s disabled population.


The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 remains only a legal document without intense sensitisation of government functionaries and citizens regarding disability. Comment. [ UPSC Civil Services Exam – Mains 2022]


Discuss the role and challenges of State Commissioners under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, in ensuring the effective implementation of disability rights in India.?[150 words]

  • Introduction:
    • Briefly explain the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (RPWD Act).
  • Body:
    • Mention the role of State Commissioners in safeguarding the rights of persons with disabilities.
    • Highlight the current challenges in the effective implementation of their mandate.
    • Emphasize the need for structural reforms and inclusive practices to make the RPWD Act effective in transforming the lives of India’s disabled population.
  • Conclusion:
    • Summarize the importance of empowering State Commissioners to uphold the rights of persons with disabilities.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *